Another day, another economic speech by Mitt Romney. Romney is constantly trying to refocus the campaign on the economy. After being sidetracked by President Obama’s announcement that he supports gay marriage speech last week, and Romney’s appeal to the religious right at Liberty University on Saturday, Romney is once again on the attack against Obama’s economic record. Romney’s Tuesday afternoon speech in Des Moines, Iowa, was nominally focused on deficit reduction.
There are plenty of reasons to worry about the rate of job growth in
the short term and federal debt accumulation in the long term, but
unfortunately Romney’s proposals would make both problems worse. Rather
than offer specific investments or incentives to hire now and plausible
plans to reduce the deficit later, when the economy is strong enough to
withstand spending cuts, Romney offers the same austerity measures that
have crippled the recovery in much of Europe.
It’s worse than just that. If Romney specified which tax loopholes he
would close and spending he would cut, at least we’d get deficit
reduction, if nothing else. It would also allow for an honest debate
about the American people’s priorities on taxes, spending and deficit
reduction. But he stubbornly refuses, out of cowardice. Specific cuts
could trigger opposition, so Romney offers only bromides.
Romney compared the rising federal debt to a “prairie fire” sweeping
the nation. “The people of Iowa and America have watched President Obama
for nearly four years, much of that time with Congress controlled by
his own party. And rather than put out the spending fire, he has fed the
fire,” said Romney. “He has spent more and borrowed more.”
While technically true, this is a bit misleading. Obama inherited an
imbalance between spending and revenue because of tax cuts and wars
started by George W. Bush and congressional Republicans. Much of the
increase in the deficit since Obama took office can be attributed to
increases in mandatory spending such as food stamps and decreases in tax
revenue that were caused by the recession he also inherited, rather
than any of his policies. While Obama did sign some new spending bills,
he also signed the Affordable Care Act, which would reduce the deficit.
Romney pledges to repeal the ACA and complains that it cut spending on
“The time has come for a president, a leader, who will lead. I will
lead us out of this debt and spending inferno,” Romney promised. But
how? Romney does not say. He wants to extend the Bush tax cuts, then cut
taxes an additional 20 percent and raise spending on defense. All of
this increases the deficit.
To pay for all of this and then reduce the deficit from current
levels would require drastic cuts in domestic programs. But Romney knows
that the American people like the idea of cutting domestic spending
more than they like cutting actual programs they rely upon. So he avoids
offering any specifics. “Move programs to states or to the private
sector where they can be run more efficiently and where we can do a
better job helping the people who need our help,” said Romney. “Shut
down programs that aren’t working. And streamline everything that’s
left.” None of this really means anything. No one is for programs that
aren’t working or inefficiencies. Unless you say which programs you
believe are not working, or which inefficiencies you will remove, you
aren’t really saying anything at all. Romney says he will lead on this
issue, but he offers no leadership at all. POST
NYPD Stop-And-Frisk Trial Ends As Judge Peppers City With Questions - NEW YORK -- The trial of the New York City Police Department's controversial stop-and-frisk practice ended on Monday as lawyers defending the city were p...
4 hours ago